Tag Archive for: competitive bidding

By Jeanine Gleba, UOAA Advocacy Manager

Despite the government shutdown, United Ostomy Associations of America (UOAA) successfully hosted Patient Voices on the Hill Day on October 8th. UOAA advocates from across the country—strategically chosen from districts and states with influential lawmakers on health policy—traveled to Washington, D.C. to protect access to ostomy and urological supplies.

💬 Patients Speak Out

During a full day of meetings, advocates shared powerful clinical insights and personal stories to educate Members of Congress and Administration officials about the dangers of including ostomy and urological supplies in the Competitive Bidding Program (CBP). They highlighted how treating these medical devices as “one-size-fits-all” equipment could severely limit access to essential, individualized prosthetic supplies—putting patient safety, health, and quality of life at risk.

The patient stories shared were deeply moving. Advocates showed photos, supplies, and firsthand experiences illustrating the physical and emotional impact of pouch leaks, skin damage, and the challenges of living with an ostomy. Their voices made the issue personal, underscoring the human cost of misguided policy changes.

In every meeting, UOAA advocates called for Congressional oversight to ensure that ostomy and urological prosthetic devices remain excluded from the CBP proposal.

Patient Voices on the Hill Day Advocates included, back row from left: Dr. Diego Schaps, Mark Jassey, Rick Riessle, Rolf Benirshke and Mike McGinty Middle row from left: Lisa Donovan, Jeanine Gleba, Jenny Levinson, Laura Kaiser (APRN, CWOCN) Briana Hovermale, Jessica Pelle, Colleen Seeber-Combs, Theresa Johnson, Megan Miller (CWOCN), Christine Ryan, Rebecca Mcelyea (CWOCN) and Kimberly Sanders. Front row from left: Reilly and Tracy Otto, Steve Kearley. Missing from photo: Sananda A. Jones. Photo by Ed Pfueller, UOAA Communications and Outreach Manager.

The fly-in brought together 16 dedicated patient advocates and caregivers, including ostomy nurses and leaders from UOAA, Convatec, and a representative from the WOCN Society. Together, they conducted 30 meetings across Capitol Hill—8 in the Senate and 22 in the House—engaging 16 Republican and 14 Democratic offices. Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle expressed strong interest in safeguarding patient access to medically necessary products.

As a result, the event generated significant bipartisan support and strengthened relationships with Congressional champions committed to protecting access to ostomy and urological supplies as essential prosthetic medical devices.

We extend our deepest gratitude to all the advocates who took time from their lives to speak out on behalf of our community, and to Convatec for joining forces with us to make this effort possible.

In addition, thank you to the 1,000 advocates nationwide who responded to our most recent Call to Action!  Your stories and outreach encouraged Representatives to sign a Congressional Letter led by Reps. Neal Dunn (R-FL) and Greg Murphy (R-NC)—both urologists—urging CMS and OMB to withdraw the proposal. The final letter, sent on October 9, 2025, was signed by 26 Members of Congress, a strong showing of bipartisan support. UOAA’s advocacy efforts were recognized in a recent HME News Article.

At this time, there are no open action alerts for this campaign. However, if you have received a response from your elected official, please contact us at advocacy@ostomy.org so we can continue the dialogue with their offices. 

We will continue to provide updates as they become available. For background information, updates, and ways to get involved—including social media tools—please visit our Competitive Bidding advocacy page.

We expect the final ruling on this issue in November. Regardless of the outcome, please know that UOAA remains steadfast in its commitment to work with policymakers and ensure continued access to the supplies that support dignity, health, and quality of life for all people living with an ostomy.

Thank you for standing with us and lending your voice to this vital effort.

NEW UPDATE! List of  specific Lawmakers wen need to contact ASAP – take action here.

Join UOAA’s Advocacy Network to get the latest alerts to take advocacy action on issues important to our ostomy and continent diversion community!

By UOAA Advocacy Manager Jeanine Gleba

Under UOAA’s national advocacy program we develop position papers on topics concerning people living with an ostomy or continent diversion. This official “position” is formally approved by the Board of Directors. These important documents might give background information, description of the impact on our community, and in some cases, advocate for change. 

These papers also provide a perspective into UOAA’s views, and can be used by you, to strengthen your own self-advocacy efforts. Individuals and UOAA Affiliated Support Groups can use them when talking to key decision-makers such as your elected officials, the media, or anyone who wants to know more about where UOAA stands on the topic/issue. 

UOAA currently has position statements available on the following advocacy efforts:

 

Disability Integration Act (DIA) (S117/HR555)This civil rights bipartisan legislation would require insurance providers to cover community-based health care services for people with disabilities as an alternative to institutionalization. The DIA would ensure that people could not be prematurely forced into nursing facilities because they couldn’t get assistance with health-related tasks such as maintenance and use of a stable ostomy. This is a good thing and we support it! UOAA’s position is here

Medicare’s Competitive Bidding Program – UOAA is actively working to maintain the current Medicare reimbursement system for ostomy and urological products. Currently ostomy and urological supplies are not included in the Competitive Bidding Program and we want to keep it that way. UOAA’s full opposition is here

Opioid Crisis – UOAA wants to ensure that any plan, especially legislatively or regulatorily, to address the opioid crisis considers the needs of those who require the use of opioids for non-pain treatments of medical conditions such as high output stomas for some people living with an ostomy or fecal continent diversion. UOAA’s position is here

Removing Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening Act (S668/HR1570) – This act would eliminate cost-sharing for initial and follow-up colorectal cancer screening tests such as removal of polyps for Medicare beneficiaries. Cost-savings for senior citizens and move lives saved is a no-brainer. UOAA’s position is here.

All of our position statements are available for download and printing on our advocacy webpage.  We encourage our community to frequently check this page as efforts get updated or closed, and new issues may arise.